Skip to content
Comparison

n8n vs Make.com — the honest comparison

Both are excellent. They win in different situations. Here's how we pick between them on real client projects.

Updated June 2026 · By ClarioAI

TL;DR

  • Pick Make if you want the smoothest beginner UX, need 1700+ integrations, and operate under 20K ops/mo.
  • Pick n8n if you're building AI-heavy workflows, need self-hosting (Canadian data residency, on-prem), or scaling past 50K ops/mo.
  • For AI agents specifically: n8n wins by a wide margin in 2026.

Feature-by-feature

Featuren8nMake.com
Pricing modelFlat self-host or fixed cloud tierPer-operation (every step counts)
Cost at 50K ops/mo~$50 flat self-hosted~$170/mo Pro tier
HostingSelf-host anywhere or CloudEU cloud only
AI / LLM nodesNative OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Ollama, agents, vector storesBasic OpenAI nodes
Integrations1000+1700+
Visual debuggerGoodExcellent
Beginner-friendlyMediumHigh
Open sourceYes (fair-code)No
Data residency (Canada)Yes (self-host)EU only
Custom code nodesJS, Python, full HTTPLimited JS

FAQs

Is n8n cheaper than Make.com?

Usually yes for high volume. Make charges per operation (each step is an op), so a 10-step workflow at 5K runs = 50K ops. Self-hosted n8n is flat. Below ~20K ops/mo, Make is competitive.

Which is easier to learn?

Make has a slightly more polished UI and better visual debugging for beginners. n8n is more powerful but has a steeper curve for branching workflows.

Which handles AI workflows better?

n8n. Native nodes for OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Ollama, plus a built-in agent framework and vector store integrations. Make has AI nodes but they're shallower.

Can I self-host Make?

No. Make is cloud-only, hosted in the EU. n8n self-hosts anywhere — Canada, US, on-prem, air-gapped.

Which has more integrations?

Make has ~1700, n8n ~1000. Both cover the SMB stack. n8n's HTTP node + community nodes close most gaps.